Hi Vitaliy, Daniel
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:05:08 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > Vitaliy wrote:
> > > Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Can you
> > > check attached patch? ( do not tune off CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE)
>
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:57:34 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy, Daniel
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:05:08 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > Vitaliy wrote:
> > > > Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Ca
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 12:25:15 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:57:34 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > Hi Vitaliy, Daniel
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:20:15PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:05:08 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > > Vit
Hi Vitaliy,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:07:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 12:25:15 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:57:34 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > >
> > > According to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161
> >
> > Are you
Privet Vitaliy
Could you point to these two patches and I can check in the
subversion tree for the debian kernel whether they are applied or not.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:07:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 12:25:15 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009 09:31:20 am Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Privet Vitaliy
>
> Could you point to these two patches and I can check in the
> subversion tree for the debian kernel whether they are applied or not.
Hello Ola! I asked khlebnikov@ about patch
diff-inotify-delay-final-put-20090204 a
Privet Vitaliy
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:26:27PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Friday 20 November 2009 09:31:20 am Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Privet Vitaliy
> >
> > Could you point to these two patches and I can check in the
> > subversion tree for the debian kernel whether they are applied or
Hi Daniel,
I don't have much light to shed on your bug, except that I've got something
similar without the nvidia kernel taint.
You wrote:
> XFS > LVM > dm_crypt > MD (RAID1) > { SATA AHCI, IDE PIIX }
I'm running: ext3 loopback > ext3 > LVM > aacraid scsi.
The bug was triggered while I was ex
Hi Vitaliy ...
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:02:04AM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > > Can you specify a link w
On Thursday 05 March 2009 12:22:39 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy ...
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:02:04AM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 0
On Saturday 07 March 2009 12:13:14 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:04:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > Tom wrote:
> > > Is there anything else I can do to help you debug this?
> >
> > Warn message reffers to the shmem_free_blocks():
> >
> > static void
Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:58:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Saturday 07 March 2009 12:13:14 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > Hi Vitaliy,
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:04:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > Tom wrote:
> > > > Is there anything else I can do to help you debug
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 09:44:15 pm Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:58:48PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 March 2009 12:13:14 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > Hi Vitaliy,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 10:04:13PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> >
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 07:02:31 pm Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:58:53AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > > Also it will be nice if you compile your kernel with spin lock debug
> >
> > And with lockdep debug
>
> I have set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
>
> but I am not sur
Vitaliy,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 07:48:45PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > I have set
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
> >
> > but I am not sure what CONFIG_ to set for "lockdep debug".
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
Ok ... built and running .
Hi, Tom.
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 12:26:54 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> I have attached another set of debug info from another case of this bug.
> I was away last week so didn't notice it until today.
>
> The files are split up better so it should be easier to read.
>
> One small prob
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:51:02PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> 2. We need sysrq-D info after lockup, so try to compile kernel without
> CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS.
With this week's new Debian lenny kernel source package, I had no problem
making an OpenVZ kernel with my previous config, but without
CON
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:03:21PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:51:02PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > 2. We need sysrq-D info after lockup, so try to compile kernel without
> > CONFIG_BEANCOUNTERS.
>
> With this week's new Debian lenny kernel source package, I had no
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
>
> I will send you the sysrq-D info next time I get the bug!
Oops ... now OpenVZ won't start!
magrathea:~# vzctl start 101
Starting VE ...
MOUNTING
On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:57:43 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
> >
> > I will send you the sysrq-D info next time I get the bug!
>
> Oops ... now OpenVZ won't start!
On 7 February 2009 00:44:33 Tom Rathborne wrote:
It is very strange bug.
Can you specify a link where I can obtain vmliniX 2.6.26-1-openvz-amd64 image?
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I don't have much light to shed on your bug, except that I've got something
> similar without the nvidia kernel taint.
>
> Yo
Hi Vitaliy,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> It is very strange bug.
It sure is!
> Can you specify a link where I can obtain vmliniX 2.6.26-1-openvz-amd64 image?
Here's the Debian package page:
http://packages.debian.org/en/lenny/linux-image-2.6.26-1-openvz-
On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > It is very strange bug.
>
> It sure is!
>
> > Can you specify a link where I can obtain vmliniX 2.6.26-1-openvz-amd64
> > image?
>
> Here's the Debian package
Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On 20 February 2009 23:21:54 Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:27:52PM +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > > It is very strange bug.
> >
> > It sure is!
> >
> > > Can you specify a link where I can obtain
Hi Vitaliy,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:21:45PM +0400, Vitaily Gusev wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:57:43 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:59PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> > > I commented out the junk in fs/dcache.c and the kernel compiled. :)
> > >
> > > I will se
Hi, Tom. I will prepare and send patch to you in two-three days. Sorry for late
response, but I was busy.
On Saturday 18 April 2009 01:19:14 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:21:45PM +0400, Vitaily Gusev wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 April 2009 01:57:43 am Tom Rathbo
Hi Vitaliy,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:07:31PM +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On Monday 20 April 2009 08:01:59 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> > Hi, Tom. I will prepare and send patch to you in two-three days.
> > Sorry for late response, but I was busy.
>
> Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual f
On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:05:08 am Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
> > Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Can you check
> > attached patch? ( do not tune off CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE)
>
> This patch makes sense. I have applied it to the latest Debian Lenny
> kernel and will let
On Monday 20 April 2009 08:01:59 pm Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> Hi, Tom. I will prepare and send patch to you in two-three days. Sorry for
> late
> response, but I was busy.
Hello, Tom!. Does this problem still actual for you? Can you check attached
patch? ( do not tune off
CONFIG_USER_RESOURCE)
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
