Err... yes. That's not the right behavior at all! Sorry for the
inconvenience.
Tony
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:27 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since the update I have to specify -p 22 when using cssh. I think it's
> better to not use an explicit "" (empty?) port as default, but instead
>
Hi
Since the update I have to specify -p 22 when using cssh. I think it's
better to not use an explicit "" (empty?) port as default, but instead
don't invoke commands with -p if the port is not set.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Thank you for the bug report and the patch! I'm going to confer with
the upstream author to make sure that -p is acceptable and will prepare
an update for the Debian package.
Cheers,
Tony
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:13 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Gerfried Fuchs [2009-01-30 11:23:48 CET]:
> >
tags 513571 + patch
thanks
* Gerfried Fuchs [2009-01-30 11:23:48 CET]:
> When using ctel to test e.g. some mail servers for consistency, it's
> quite inconvenient to have to put :25 after every single host. It would
> be quite helpful if it's possible to be able to specify a different
> default
Package: clusterssh
Version: 3.22-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
When using ctel to test e.g. some mail servers for consistency, it's
quite inconvenient to have to put :25 after every single host. It would
be quite helpful if it's possible to be able to specify a different
default port through
5 matches
Mail list logo
