Hi Jerome,
Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 23:58 +0100 schrieb a...@librelogiciel.com:
Unfortunately they've decided against fixing this problem upstream
finally, see their BTS link above.
If you know for sure these datas were produced with foomatic maybe you
could see if its authors would mind
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:02:10AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
The .ppd file is the one downloaded from
http://kyoceramita.com/download/
for Kyocera_FS-C5300DN (German, that is at
http://www.kyoceramita.eu/index/service/dlc.false.driver.FSC5300DN._.EN.html
the very bottom.
I have little
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:43:26PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Montag, den 16.02.2009, 18:39 +0100 schrieb a...@librelogiciel.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:23:56PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’d expect them so see the latter case (PS interpreter), but from a user
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 15.02.2009, 18:37 +0100 schrieb a...@librelogiciel.com:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:05:04PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’m not sure if I can follow this argument. The attached print file was
not valid postscript, but rather postscript wrapped in an PJL print job,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:23:56PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’d expect them so see the latter case (PS interpreter), but from a user
point of view, it doesn’t matter much :-)
It seems the bug report was accepted by GhostScript's upstream
developers, and there's a patch, please see :
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.02.2009, 18:39 +0100 schrieb a...@librelogiciel.com:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 06:23:56PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’d expect them so see the latter case (PS interpreter), but from a user
point of view, it doesn’t matter much :-)
It seems the bug report was
Hi Jerome,
thanks for your quick answer.
Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 16:13 +0100 schrieb a...@librelogiciel.com:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
This is a bug in GhotScript, not in pkpgcounter as can be seen below :
jer...@lafrime:~$ gs testprintfile
GPL
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 03:05:04PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’m not sure if I can follow this argument. The attached print file was
not valid postscript, but rather postscript wrapped in an PJL print job,
if I understand it correctly. Therefore, it can not be a bug in
ghostscript.
You
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 06:37:42PM +0100, a...@librelogiciel.com wrote:
I'm not 100% against implementing a workaround for this problem, but I'd
prefer that ghostscript developers handle this situation, otherwise
other developers would have to create similar workarounds for their own
software.
Package: pkpgcounter
Version: 3.50-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
when trying to get ink accounting working here, it failed because the
file that CUPS sent to pkpgcounter (via pykota) contained a PJL header:
$ pkpgcounter -cGC
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Package: pkpgcounter
Version: 3.50-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
when trying to get ink accounting working here, it failed because the
file that CUPS sent to pkpgcounter
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 04:13:12PM +0100, a...@librelogiciel.com wrote:
This is a bug in GhotScript, not in pkpgcounter as can be seen below :
In any case, if you want a workaround to be considered for a future
release, please create a ticket asking so on http://trac.pykota.com
thx in davance
12 matches
Mail list logo
