Bug#300759: Bug#515532: "minesweeper feature" vs. UNIX philosophy

Another little oddity caused by this feature, it is recommended by the meta-package games-minesweeper: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804793 -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo

Bug#300759: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#300759: Bug#515532: "minesweeper feature" vs. UNIX philosophy

Hi, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: > Another little oddity caused by this feature, it is recommended by the > meta-package games-minesweeper: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804793 On purpose! That was actually my suggestion. P.S.: As stated by Markus in that bug

Bug#300759: Bug#515532: "minesweeper feature" vs. UNIX philosophy

2009-02-17 03:53 Daniel Burrows: [...] Minesweeper is not a maintenance burden and it adds character to the program. One of the few perks of writing code for free is that I can produce software which is recognizably written by a human being and not by an automaton. I get to write the other

Bug#515532: minesweeper feature vs. UNIX philosophy

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:17:00AM +0100, David Orban dor...@skynet.be was heard to say: Because it was archived, I had no other possibility to reply than to fill it again. You need the unarchive command. The idea of removing useless game from a package manager software is there to

Bug#515532: minesweeper feature vs. UNIX philosophy

Package: aptitude Version: 0.2.11.1-4 Severity: wishlist This is a wishlist item I filed in 2005. The archived bug number is 300759. You can see the Debian report log for this bug @ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300759. After remaining silent for more than 3 years, Daniel