Bug#515544: (no subject)

2009-03-02 Thread Daniel Moerner
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Trent W. Buck wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote: >> I am willing to adopt scheme48. I currently maintain ypsilon, an >> R6RS Scheme interpreter that is waiting in NEW. Ypsilon only >> supports amd64 and x86; I still use scheme48

Bug#515544: (no subject)

2009-03-02 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 08:22:51AM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote: > I am willing to adopt scheme48. I currently maintain ypsilon, an > R6RS Scheme interpreter that is waiting in NEW. Ypsilon only > supports amd64 and x86; I still use scheme48 on my powerpc and armel > machines. Cool, let me know wha

Bug#515544: (no subject)

2009-02-21 Thread Daniel Moerner
retitle 515544 ITA: scheme48 -- A simple, modular, and lightweight Scheme implementation owner 515544 ! thanks Hi Trent, I am willing to adopt scheme48. I currently maintain ypsilon, an R6RS Scheme interpreter that is waiting in NEW. Ypsilon only supports amd64 and x86; I still use scheme48 on