Am Samstag, 19. März 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
Would you be kind enough to test it? I don't crash my systems as
often as you do, and they're setup in a way that
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
So my approach failed. But I wonder whether your approach would have done
more good than my daily backups, since uptimed doesn't do a regular backup
of the configuration, but only on stopping it, maybe also on
Am Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
So my approach failed. But I wonder whether your approach would have
done more good than my daily backups, since uptimed doesn't do a
regular backup of the
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de
wrote:
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
As stated before, the correct solution would be to add another layer
of checks during daemon startup, which would
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
Would you be kind enough to test it? I don't crash my systems as often
as you do, and they're setup in a way that apparently makes it
impossible for me to reproduce
Am Saturday 19 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
You wrote you build it already. Do you have that package still
available? Then I'd test it after I am convinced that the fsync()
based version does what it should.
Well no, I don't have the test build anymore. Since you were able to
test
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.dewrote:
Since after loosing uptime records once again due to a crash while testing
kernels I am so through with it that it is not even funny anymore,
Theodore T'so said that one should not fear the fsync() [1] - especially
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.dewrote:
Since after loosing uptime records once again due to a crash while
testing kernels I am so through with it that it is not even funny
anymore, Theodore T'so said that
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
As stated before, the correct solution would be to add another layer of
checks during daemon startup, which would assert that the file it's
reading is valid (i.e. to
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de
wrote:
Am Sunday 06 March 2011 schrieb Thibaut VARENE:
As stated before, the correct solution would be to add another layer of
checks during daemon
Since after loosing uptime records once again due to a crash while testing
kernels I am so through with it that it is not even funny anymore,
Theodore T'so said that one should not fear the fsync() [1] - especially
not with Ext4 - and I prefer not loosing uptime records over and over and
over
11 matches
Mail list logo
