* Frank Lichtenheld [2009-02-21 14:11]:
> So is this discussion an indication that we should wait with the
> removal or should we go ahead?
It should go ahead anyway.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
tag 516225 moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:46:42PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Woody Suwalski [2009-02-20 08:20]:
> > Unfortunately I think that it is the case.
> > However (unofficially) Martin U have mentioned once that there was a libc
> > hack to actually permit old StrongA
* Woody Suwalski [2009-02-20 08:20]:
> Unfortunately I think that it is the case.
> However (unofficially) Martin U have mentioned once that there was a libc
> hack to actually permit old StrongARM to boot armel?
> Could U send me more info (in case I have too much time on my hands ;-))
I don't
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Luk Claes [2009-02-19 23:17]:
Please remove nwutil, it's only being built on arm which is being dropped.
Well, I think it would be nice to talk to the maintainer first, but
yes, it's the right thing to do. (And it was on my TODO list to talk
to Woody about it
* Luk Claes [2009-02-19 23:17]:
> Please remove nwutil, it's only being built on arm which is being dropped.
Well, I think it would be nice to talk to the maintainer first, but
yes, it's the right thing to do. (And it was on my TODO list to talk
to Woody about it. Woody, this is about removing n
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi
Please remove nwutil, it's only being built on arm which is being dropped.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
