On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:14:10AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 22:49, Roberto C. Sánchez
> wrote:
> > Ondřej,
> >
> > Is this patch safe to apply and upload even though #591553 is not yet
> > fixed?
> >
> > That package is still shipping this in /usr/lib/libnuclient.la:
>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 22:49, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Ondřej,
>
> Is this patch safe to apply and upload even though #591553 is not yet
> fixed?
>
> That package is still shipping this in /usr/lib/libnuclient.la:
>
> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libsasl2.la -ldl -lresolv
> -L/build/buildd-nufw
Hi Robert,
I would say that you just go ahead, upload the package without la files and
bump the severity of the #591553 to serious.
You filled the bug several months ago and you don't have to wait for
unresponsive maintainer (and in my experience - removal from testing will
usualy create some
Ondřej,
Is this patch safe to apply and upload even though #591553 is not yet
fixed?
That package is still shipping this in /usr/lib/libnuclient.la:
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libsasl2.la -ldl -lresolv
-L/build/buildd-nufw_2.4.2-1-i386-dMq4d4/nufw-2.4.2/src/include
/usr/lib/libnussl.la -lpthre
Package: libsasl2-modules
Severity: normal
Updated patch due libopie-dev bug change.
O.
diff --git a/debian/libsasl2-dev.install b/debian/libsasl2-dev.install
index f4da345..77cc994 100644
--- a/debian/libsasl2-dev.install
+++ b/debian/libsasl2-dev.install
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
usr/include/sasl
-usr/l
5 matches
Mail list logo