On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:31:34PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01P
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> > I don't see any discussion beyond wh
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > I don't see any discussion beyond what is in the bug report on
> > pkg-ace-devel in the last few
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>>
>> > The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
>> > autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_I
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
>
> > The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
> > autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
> > AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wra
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck wrote:
> The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
> autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
> AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wrappers/configure.ac:
>
> checking for bsearch... yes
> ../ACE_wrappers/configure
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> tags 518735 - patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>> tags 518735 patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
>
> Thanks for the patch!, ... but unf
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please don't. I am currently busy but I will h
(Cross-posting from Debian)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
>
> I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
> soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
> be diagnost
9 matches
Mail list logo
