On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:40:02PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Thanks for the patch!, ... but unfortunately it is not enough
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
tags 518735 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Thanks for the patch!, ... but
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wrappers/configure.ac:
checking for bsearch... yes
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I don't see any discussion beyond what is in the bug report on
pkg-ace-devel in
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I don't
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:31:34PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun,
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please don't. I am currently busy but I will
Hi,
All the files from Thomas are part of the distribution, see
ACE_wrappers/debianbuild. Part is updated, if you have patches for these
debian package file, send them to the list, then we can integrate it.
What is the real problem?
Johnny
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please prove me wrong in wanting this package removed
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please prove me wrong in wanting this package removed from testing
(Cross-posting from Debian)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be
tags 518735 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Thanks for the patch!, ... but unfortunately it is not enough (hence I'm
temporarily untagging this bug with
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Hi
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
--- ACE_wrappers/m4/ace_defines.m4 2008/09/18 18:56:13 82783
+++ ACE_wrappers/m4/ace_defines.m4 2008/09/18 21:22:05 82784
@@ -20,12 +20,12 @@
Package: ace
Version: 5.6.3-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090307 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
cd
16 matches
Mail list logo
