Dear all,
I wrote:
Attached are
seven patches
but it was to the wrong bug. Please disregard my previous message.
Apologies for the line noise.
Regards,
Jonathan Nieder
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Adnène Trojette adn+...@diwi.org
* Package name: xz
Version : 4.999.8beta
Upstream Author : Lasse Collins
* URL : http://tukaani.org/xz/
* License : - public domain (src/liblzma/check, tests/files)
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 19:37:33 +0100
Mohammed Adnène Trojette adn+...@diwi.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Adnène Trojette adn+...@diwi.org
* Package name: xz
Would xz-utils not be a better package name?
XZ Utils consist of a few relatively separate parts:
On Mon, March 9, 2009 05:07, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mohammed Adnène Trojette adn+...@diwi.org
* Package name: xz
Version : 4.999.8beta
Upstream Author : Lasse Collins
* URL : http://tukaani.org/xz/
* License
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009, Karl Goetz wrote:
Perhaps it would be worth specifying 2+ and 3+ (Since thats what upstreams
tarball seems to indicate).
You're absolutely right.
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
5 matches
Mail list logo
