Package: etckeeper Version: 0.34 Severity: normal The darcs backend creates a repository in darcs-1.0, which has known problems and is only supported so that developers that are stuck using darcs 1.0 (e.g. Etch users) can continue to work with repositories.
I think the default for etckeeper should be the same as the default for Darcs itself, which is to create repos in darcs-2. Note that Lenny has Darcs 2.0.0, so the only excuse for forcing the shitty old repo format on unsuspecting etckeeper users is to support OLDstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages etckeeper depends on: ii darcs 2.2.0-1 a distributed, interactive, smart ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.25 Debian configuration management sy ii git-core 1:1.6.2-1 fast, scalable, distributed revisi ii mercurial 1.1.2-2 scalable distributed version contr Versions of packages etckeeper recommends: pn cron <none> (no description available) etckeeper suggests no packages. -- debconf information: * etckeeper/unclean: true etckeeper/commit_failed: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
