Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Yeah, but the check for XkbBell includes X11/extensions/XKBbells.h
which is in libxkbfile-dev. That said, it looks like this check failed
in previous versions too, so if 241-1 worked then that's probably not
it.
Apologies for taking so long to
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 08:50 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Sending ^G to xterm 242 with visual-bell mode off (as it is by
default) has no effect. The visual bell still works fine, as do
auditory bells from other applications. xterm 241 had no such
problem. I don't have time to debug the issue
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Can you rebuild xterm with libxkbfile-dev installed
I've done so, but I won't be able to see if that makes a difference
until I get home. I don't think that's it, though -- AFAICT, XkbBell
is in libX11, and my rebuilt xterm doesn't depend on
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 16:48 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
Can you rebuild xterm with libxkbfile-dev installed
I've done so, but I won't be able to see if that makes a difference
until I get home. I don't think that's it, though -- AFAICT, XkbBell
Package: xterm
Version: 242-1
Severity: normal
Sending ^G to xterm 242 with visual-bell mode off (as it is by
default) has no effect. The visual bell still works fine, as do
auditory bells from other applications. xterm 241 had no such
problem. I don't have time to debug the issue at the
5 matches
Mail list logo