tags 523483 + pending
thanks
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:30 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> Indeed. Some other packages have taken the approach of only editing such
> files if they contain a comment that says something like "delete this line
> to keep this file from being managed by debconf".
I disli
* Arthur de Jong [2009-04-18 18:51:30 +0200]:
> I'm not saying nsswitch.conf should be a conffile. What I'm saying is
> that if an admin manually made changes to a file, those changes should
> not be automatically undone when some package is removed.
... or installed.
>
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 16:10 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> You almost make it sound like /etc/nsswitch.conf ought to be a
> conffile after all. But then why are you editing it in postinst?
> (Unconditionally, I may add: the admin doesn't get a chance to say
> "leave nsswitch.conf alone"; you're aski
* Arthur de Jong [2009-04-17 22:33:16 +0200]:
> I'm a bit reluctant to automatically remove stuff from nsswitch.conf
> because the admin, when he installed the package, indicated that
> nsswitch.conf should be edited or the admin may have edited it manually
> to include ldap lookups.
You almost ma
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 17:04 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> The postinst script for this package edits /etc/nsswitch.conf based on
> the answers to debconf questions.
>
> The changes should be undone when the package is removed (unless perhaps
> it is being replaced with libnss-ldap), but currently
Package: libnss-ldapd
Version: 0.6.7.1
(Also found in version 0.6.8.)
The postinst script for this package edits /etc/nsswitch.conf based on
the answers to debconf questions.
The changes should be undone when the package is removed (unless perhaps
it is being replaced with libnss-ldap), but curr
6 matches
Mail list logo
