Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2010-05-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >Another option could be that when CFLAGS is unset (rather than empty), > >CDBS detects this and doesn't pass anything as override. This allows > >user to explicitly set CFLAGS in DEB_MAKE_ENVVARS, or not at all. > > Actually, first off when I read

Bug#523642: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Saturday 11 April 2009 18:35:26 Robert Millan wrote: > CFLAGS are overriden too agressively. Some packages have very specific > requirements when it comes to CFLAGS, and its upstream Makefiles will > know better. If CFLAGS is important for them, they can do things like: Isn't this the exact s

Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package cdbs tags 523642 -wontfix thanks On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 02:53:32PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> >On Sat, Ap

Bug#523642: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-12 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > >On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> > >> I do not say that CDBS is correct or not in its current behaviour, > >> just that it ha

Bug#523642: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:07:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >> I do not say that CDBS is correct or not in its current behaviour, >> just that it has a well defined vurrent beha

Bug#523642: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-11 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I do not say that CDBS is correct or not in its current behaviour, just > that it has a well defined vurrent behaviour that users rely on (whether > or not they are aware of it). > > I have tagged this as wontfix for that rea

Bug#523642: [Build-common-hackers] Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package cdbs tags 523642 wontfix thanks Hi Robert, On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >CFLAGS are overriden too agressively. Some packages have very specific >requirements when it comes to CFLAGS, and its upstream Makef

Bug#523642: overrides CFLAGS too agressively

2009-04-11 Thread Robert Millan
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.52 Severity: important Tags: patch CFLAGS are overriden too agressively. Some packages have very specific requirements when it comes to CFLAGS, and its upstream Makefiles will know better. If CFLAGS is important for them, they can do things like: # we want -foo and