Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> > Could we go back to the reasons that made us use this patch
> > (apparently the comments have vanished in the patch). IIRC,
> > this was because of a user mentioning the binaries' "bloat". However,
> > if reducing that bloat makes us lose some functi
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 06:01:34AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> > I fear this is probably due to the shrink_dead_code patch, whose express
> > purpose is to trim functions out of the binaries that aren't used in the
> > program - we have no good w
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
> > Steve, any expertise here?
>
> I fear this is probably due to the shrink_dead_code patch, whose express
> purpose is to trim functions out of the binaries that aren't used in the
> program - we have no good way to detect that we want to keep these f
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 06:09:07PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> found 524048 2:3.3.3-1
> thanks
> Quoting Petr Novak (pet...@volny.cz):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 2:3.3.2-1
> > Severity: normal
> > Module acl_xattr.so is not possible to load. Share with definiton
> > vfs_objects=acl_xa
found 524048 2:3.3.3-1
thanks
Quoting Petr Novak (pet...@volny.cz):
> Package: samba
> Version: 2:3.3.2-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Module acl_xattr.so is not possible to load. Share with definiton
> vfs_objects=acl_xattr is inaccessible, log shows following: Error loading
> module
> '/usr/lib/sa
5 matches
Mail list logo
