On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Mon, April 20, 2009 06:15, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this
> > seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as
> > unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin
On Mon, April 20, 2009 15:53, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
>> On Mon, April 20, 2009 06:15, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this
>>> seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian
Hi
Dne Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:15:04 -0400
"Michael S. Gilbert" napsal(a):
> i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this
> seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as
> unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin page considers the issue to be
> critical. perh
i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this
seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as
unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin page considers the issue to be
critical. perhaps the debian severity is too low?
mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
4 matches
Mail list logo