Bug#524804: more info

2009-04-20 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, April 20, 2009 06:15, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > > i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this > > seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as > > unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin

Bug#524804: more info

2009-04-20 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, April 20, 2009 15:53, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> On Mon, April 20, 2009 06:15, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: >> >>> i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this >>> seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian

Bug#524804: more info

2009-04-20 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:15:04 -0400 "Michael S. Gilbert" napsal(a): > i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this > seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as > unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin page considers the issue to be > critical. perh

Bug#524804: more info

2009-04-19 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
i was looking at the link as provided in redhat's announcement. this seems to be CVE-2009-1285, which debian is already tracking as unimportant. however, the phpmyadmin page considers the issue to be critical. perhaps the debian severity is too low? mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b