retitle 526924 zparseopts: separate options in
also sprach Bart Schaefer [2009.05.05.1905 +0200]:
> The parameter is set to (-a 1 -a 2), but "print -l $arr" is consuming
> the first -a as an option to print.
Confirmed. This leaves the question of whether something could be
used to separated the
On May 5, 4:05pm, Clint Adams wrote:
}
} set -- -a1 -a2; zparseopts 'a+:=arr'; print -l $arr
}
} although this seems to set arr=(1 -a 2), which is not what I
} expected to happen.
The parameter is set to (-a 1 -a 2), but "print -l $arr" is consuming
the first -a as an option to print.
--
To
also sprach Clint Adams [2009.05.05.1805 +0200]:
> Unfortunately we don't handle arrays as values of associate arrays
> (yet?) but you can do something like
Aha.
pulse:~|master|% declare -A foo; foo[Clint]=(1 2 3)
zsh: foo: attempt to set slice of associative array
:(
> set -- -a1 -a2; zparseo
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:01:24PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> piper:~|master|% set -- -a1 -a2; zparseopts -A arr a+:; echo $arr[-a]
> 12
>
> Unfortunately, this greatly reduces the usefulness of the builtin,
> since it's impossible to tell from the hash value whether the
> options where -a1 -
Package: zsh-beta
Version: 4.3.9-dev-3+20090425-1
Severity: wishlist
piper:~|master|% set -- -a1 -a2; zparseopts -A arr a+:; echo $arr[-a]
12
Unfortunately, this greatly reduces the usefulness of the builtin,
since it's impossible to tell from the hash value whether the
options where -a1 -a2 or -
5 matches
Mail list logo
