Hello,
Is there an ETA for when the aforementioned 2.1 alpha packages are
going to appear on unstable/experimental?
Thanks,
Vasilis
--
Vasilis Vasaitis
"A man is well or woe as he thinks himself so."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Sure, I can test the package once its uploaded.
Bharath
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:59 PM, William
Pitcock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 15:07 -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
>> Yes, I do have the Intel HDA (ICH9) soundcard.
>
> Aha. We have an answer then.
>
> Audacious 2.1 alpha will be hi
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 15:07 -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
> Yes, I do have the Intel HDA (ICH9) soundcard.
Aha. We have an answer then.
Audacious 2.1 alpha will be hitting experimental this weekend. Can you
test it when it's uploaded? It has a rewritten-from-scratch plugin that
fits into A
Yes, I do have the Intel HDA (ICH9) soundcard.
Bharath
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:29 AM, William
Pitcock wrote:
> Do you use an Intel HDA soundcard? There have been issues reported with
> Intel HDA cards upstream (but 2.0.1 should have fixed it, maybe not
> completely).
>
> William
>
> On Tue, 20
Do you use an Intel HDA soundcard? There have been issues reported with
Intel HDA cards upstream (but 2.0.1 should have fixed it, maybe not
completely).
William
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 13:04 -0400, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
> I deleted the entire audacious config directory and restarted
> audacious it
I deleted the entire audacious config directory and restarted
audacious it still has a high cpu usage of ~60% consistently.
Bharath
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:36 AM, William
Pitcock wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Try erasing your audacious config file, it may be broken in some way.
>
> William
>
--
To UNSUBS
Hi!
Try erasing your audacious config file, it may be broken in some way.
William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
7 matches
Mail list logo
