Kakuto-san
On Sa, 07 Sep 2013, Akira Kakuto wrote:
>> Ahh, maybe the intended rewrite was to have
>> sprintf(TAIL(tmpbuff),"%s%s%s",encap_prefix,ind.p[j].enc,encap_infix);
>> sprintf(TAIL(tmpbuff),"%s%s%s",ind.p[j].page,encap_suffix,delim_n);
>> then it would work ....
>>
>> I guess that is the better fix.
>
> I also think so.
I checked, no need. The tmpbuff used here is defined in the head
of the function as tmpbuff[4096], and the above lines are the only
lines writing to it.
So one
snprintf(tmpbuff, 4096, ...)
should be enough.
Thanks.
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
