Bug#535295: should this package be removed?

2009-07-09 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
reassign 535295 ftp.debian.org retitle 535295 RM: wordtrans -- ROM+RoQA; abandoned upstream; replaced by ktranslator thanks Sorry for the delay, I'm reassigning this bug to ask FTP masters to remove the package. Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#535295: should this package be removed?

2009-07-02 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:52PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:26:00PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Package: wordtrans Version: 1.1pre15-3.2 Severity: important Wordtrans is dead upstream and functionally superceded by ktranslator. Wordtrans

Bug#535295: should this package be removed?

2009-07-01 Thread Riku Voipio
Package: wordtrans Version: 1.1pre15-3.2 Severity: important Wordtrans is dead upstream and functionally superceded by ktranslator. Wordtrans depends on old toolkits and gcc-3.4, and has seen no maintainer upload in last two years.. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#535295: should this package be removed?

2009-07-01 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:26:00PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Package: wordtrans Version: 1.1pre15-3.2 Severity: important Wordtrans is dead upstream and functionally superceded by ktranslator. Wordtrans depends on old toolkits and gcc-3.4, and has seen no maintainer upload in last two