Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:25:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:08:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> What is "numerous software" and what are they doing with this internal
>>> und unstable interfaces?
>> Namely: enoma
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 04:25 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> In both cases, the goal is to avoid forking yet another process, by
>> calling "xm list", "xm stop" or "xm start" for example, by simply
>> including some python code and calling the main.
>
> FWIW I'd be surprised
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 04:25 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> In both cases, the goal is to avoid forking yet another process, by
> calling "xm list", "xm stop" or "xm start" for example, by simply
> including some python code and calling the main.
FWIW I'd be surprised if the upstream Xen develo
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:25:58AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:08:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > What is "numerous software" and what are they doing with this internal
> > und unstable interfaces?
> Namely: enomalism, dtc-xen (our softwa
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:08:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Related to the above also: I even asked the Xen team the request to add
>> the following 2 symlinks, that would have solve many issues in numerous
>> software:
>
> What is "numerous software" and what are the
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 08:08:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Related to the above also: I even asked the Xen team the request to add
> the following 2 symlinks, that would have solve many issues in numerous
> software:
What is "numerous software" and what are they doing with this internal
und
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:49:39PM -0400, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> Is there actually a use case for installing multiple versions of Xen on
> the same system?
Yes, its the same then with the Linux kernel or every ordinary library:
ABI stability, aka interopatibility of the components. Redhat and Su
Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> Furthermore, users who read the upstream Xen documentation (#508139), as
> well as programs that try to use the Xen binaries (#481105) or libraries
> (#507186), get thrown off by the alternate layout.
>
> Is there actually a use case for installing multiple versions of Xe
The Debian Xen packaging has been carrying a long pile of invasive patches
to use this modified filesystem layout for quite some time now. I assume
the goal is to make it possible to install multiple versions of Xen at the
same time. But that doesn’t seem to have been successful in practice
(
Package: xen-utils-3.4
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: important
pygrub uses the fsimage library to read contents of the filesystems to boot.
This package install the plugins for different filesystems at
/usr/lib/xen-3.4/lib/fs/,
but searches for them under /usr//usr/lib/fs.
(The debian patch tools-l
10 matches
Mail list logo
