On Wednesday 22 July 2009 13:25:00 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:49:13PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > If you think about an upgrade-path for the conf-files, I'm not sure
> > whether unchanged obsolete conffiles get removed automagically in the
> > meantime
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:49:13PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> If you think about an upgrade-path for the conf-files, I'm not sure
> whether unchanged obsolete conffiles get removed automagically in the
> meantime or not.
I now got a peek on 2.13.2-31.
It seems /etc/default/timidity is
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:12:25PM +0200, Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
> The reason I didn't take that approach is because I couldn't easily provide a
> transparent upgrade path here, but since indeed the current approach violates
> policy I think I will go for /etc/init.d/timidity in timidity-dae
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 11:05:18 Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Package: timidity
> Version: 2.13.2-29
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> timidity's init-script test for the existence of
> /usr/share/doc/timidity-daemon violates the Debian policy 12.3.:
> "Packages must not require the existence
Package: timidity
Version: 2.13.2-29
Severity: serious
Hello,
timidity's init-script test for the existence of
/usr/share/doc/timidity-daemon violates the Debian policy 12.3.:
"Packages must not require the existence of any files in
`/usr/share/doc/' in order to function."
A far more clean split
5 matches
Mail list logo
