On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:42:04 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > dpkg does not directly extract the control files, it uses dpkg-deb and
> > that ones uses tar to extract those files. So either filesystem or tar
> > related, but very improvable to be dpkg
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > > What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed
> > > it already)
> >
> > Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
>
> Did your machine crash/lose power during an upgrade?
No, never had a crash or a hard power down since I s
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > > What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed
> > > it already)
> >
> > Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
>
> Did your machine crash/lose power during an upgrade?
No, never had a crash or a hard power down since I s
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 23:27:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > > > What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed it
> > > > already)
> > > Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 23:27:05 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > > What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed it
> > > already)
> > Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
>
> Did your machine crash/lose power during an upg
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed it
> > already)
> Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
Did your machine crash/lose power during an upgrade?
> work. The only thing I did in between was to reboot. Maybe it is
tags 541077 + unreproducible
thanks
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> > Ok, tried again and it seems to be that the first time it gets installed
> > it exists. The next time it is removed and doesnt appear again.
>
> What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have notic
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
> Ok, tried again and it seems to be that the first time it gets installed it
> exists. The next time it is removed and doesnt appear again.
What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed it
already)
> So
> $ /var/cache/apt/archi
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-24
Ok, tried again and it seems to be that the first time it gets installed it
exists. The next time it is removed and doesnt appear again.
So
$ /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-24_amd64.deb
would install /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs
and
$ /var/cache/apt/archives/
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-24
Severity: grave
I tried to rebuild some packages and they all fail with
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /lib/libc.so.6
ls /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs
ls: cannot access /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs: No such file or directory
Other
10 matches
Mail list logo
