Looking at this more closely, this do not appear as problematic as first
can be thought. The patch I proposed earlier solves a problem on mixed
stable/testing systems (such as for the original bug reported). There
is no need to bump the shared library version of libgsasl7, which
Cascardo and I ha
tags 542512 pending + patch
thanks
Hi!
This problem looks similar to this one:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550650
I have committed the following patch in the gsasl repository which
should fix this. Please test, it will be part of the next upload.
/Simon
>From 212ad85d5c9
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:43:39PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> The problem pointed out is that dicod should work with 0.2.26-2 or gsasl
> should have broken ABI and needed a soversion bump or there is a broken
> build that should be fixed with either gsasl (through a symbols or
>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:36:59AM -0500, green wrote:
> Package: libgsasl7
> Version: 1.1-1
> Followup-For: Bug #542512
>
> Just to be clear, dicod _does_ work with libgsasl7 1.1-1. It does _not_ work
> with the lenny version 0.2.26-2. I was simply suggesting to include a dicod
> dependency "
Package: libgsasl7
Version: 1.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #542512
Just to be clear, dicod _does_ work with libgsasl7 1.1-1. It does _not_ work
with the lenny version 0.2.26-2. I was simply suggesting to include a dicod
dependency "libgsasl7 >= 1.1-1". Surely this does not suggest a bug exists in
t
5 matches
Mail list logo
