On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:51:43PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:05:32 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:08:25PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > sorry, my observation was wrong. My mutt always generated a From: line
> > > (with "re
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:05:32 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:08:25PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry, my observation was wrong. My mutt always generated a From: line
> > (with "realname "), and exim used to translate this into the
> > real address. Dm
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:08:25PM +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, my observation was wrong. My mutt always generated a From: line
> (with "realname "), and exim used to translate this into the
> real address. Dma seems to only use virtusertable if no From: line is
> present.
>
> I fi
Hi,
sorry, my observation was wrong. My mutt always generated a From: line
(with "realname "), and exim used to translate this into the
real address. Dma seems to only use virtusertable if no From: line is
present.
I fixed my mutt configuration to not generate a From: line, and now
virtusertable
Package: dma
Version: 0.0.2009.07.17-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
if I send a mail using mailx, the From: address is replaced using
virtusertable. If I send a mail in mutt, it is not.
The difference between both is that mailx just uses "usern...@hostname" as
the From: address, whereas mutt uses "My re
5 matches
Mail list logo
