Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2010-05-16 Thread Christopher Albert
Hi! I'm sorry that it won't be possible for me to maintain this package due to lack of time and knowledge :-( I rechanged the title to RFA. All the best and hope that you find a better maintainer, Chris On 11.05.2010 11:54, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:23, Christopher Albe

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2010-05-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:23, Christopher Albert wrote: > Hi Luca! > > First of all sorry for the delay, there was much unexpected work in the > last weeks :) > >> ... >> What about merging your changes in, and >> adopting package? I'm willing to guide and sponsor you in the process >> if you're

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2010-03-12 Thread Christopher Albert
Hi Luca! First of all sorry for the delay, there was much unexpected work in the last weeks :) > ... > What about merging your changes in, and > adopting package? I'm willing to guide and sponsor you in the process > if you're still interested. Please let me know :) > Thanks for the offer! Sin

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2010-03-08 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi Christopher, as you can see from [1], some pending changes have been committed already in DPMT SVN repository. What about merging your changes in, and adopting package? I'm willing to guide and sponsor you in the process if you're still interested. Please let me know :) [1]http://svn.debian.or

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2009-12-16 Thread Christopher Albert
Hi and thanks for the quick reply! Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:49, wrote: > >> Are there any major difficulties with the package or does Ondrej just not >> have the time to maintain it? >> > Yes, there are some: look at Luca's message to this bug to see the > current

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2009-12-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:49, wrote: > Are there any major difficulties with the package or does Ondrej just not > have the time to maintain it? Yes, there are some: look at Luca's message to this bug to see the current problem with the package. The reason I orphaned it is because Ondr

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc

2009-12-15 Thread albert
Hi! I'm thinking about contributing to the Debian project by adopting this package. At our institute (http://itp.tugraz.at/) we are using a Debian Cluster of Workstations for parallel computation, so we could really use this package. Since I am new to Debian project, I would need a sponsor to b

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc libraries

2009-10-10 Thread Luca Falavigna
Adopters, please note petsc4py have some open issues: >>> from petsc4py import PETSc python: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/openmpi/lib/openmpi/mca_paffinity_linux.so: undefined symbol: mca_base_param_reg_int >>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2005/09/0359.php has an in-depth analys

Bug#550458: RFA: petsc4py -- Python bindings for PETSc libraries

2009-10-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Ondrej asked to be remove from this package, so it is now without a real maintainer. Hence, a new maintainer is needed for this package. NOTE: the package must be left into the DPMT repository. Regards, Sandro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..