Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-12 Thread Daniel Moerner
Hi, Sorry for the slight delay, one of my testboxes was down so I had to request for remote access on another. On 12/10/2009 12:23 PM, Dave Pitts wrote: Also, just a little reminder that you might want to update the link on your homepage to point to the latest tarball

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-10 Thread Daniel Moerner
NOTE: My apologies if this message got sent twice, the first version was incomplete and missing some of the attachments. On 12/09/2009 10:40 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/08/2009 07:48 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: If we're going to productize this program. I'm going to add

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-10 Thread Dave Pitts
Daniel Moerner wrote: NOTE: My apologies if this message got sent twice, the first version was incomplete and missing some of the attachments. Only got one message. On 12/09/2009 10:40 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/08/2009 07:48 AM, Dave Pitts wrote:

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-10 Thread Daniel Moerner
On 12/10/2009 08:20 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: OK, I've made equivalent changes to the Makefile. The install program does not exist on all *nix platforms. Only Linux (I think)... Also, added the man page install. Thanks, it looks good. I do have a question, though: Is there any reason to install

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-10 Thread Dave Pitts
Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/10/2009 08:20 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: OK, I've made equivalent changes to the Makefile. The install program does not exist on all *nix platforms. Only Linux (I think)... Also, added the man page install. Thanks, it looks good. I do have a question, though: Is

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-09 Thread Dave Pitts
Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/08/2009 07:48 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: If we're going to productize this program. I'm going to add files to the tarball like ChangeLog, README, etc. Do you have any other recommendations? Also, I'll start the version numbering at 1.0.0 for this distribution work.

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-08 Thread Dave Pitts
Daniel Moerner wrote: On 12/07/2009 08:31 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: Daniel Moerner wrote: Hi David, I see that you've done the work to write an interpreter for the FOCAL language. Recently, a request for this package was filed in Debian GNU/Linux.[1] I'd be interested in packaging your

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-08 Thread Daniel Moerner
On 12/08/2009 07:48 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: If we're going to productize this program. I'm going to add files to the tarball like ChangeLog, README, etc. Do you have any other recommendations? Also, I'll start the version numbering at 1.0.0 for this distribution work. Well, I'd like to stress

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-07 Thread Daniel Moerner
On 12/07/2009 08:31 AM, Dave Pitts wrote: Daniel Moerner wrote: Hi David, I see that you've done the work to write an interpreter for the FOCAL language. Recently, a request for this package was filed in Debian GNU/Linux.[1] I'd be interested in packaging your interpreter for distribution

Bug#551763: License for focal?

2009-12-06 Thread Daniel Moerner
Hi, This seems like an interesting piece of history. However, I see no license in the tarball, or even version information. Is this really open source? Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#551763: License for FOCAL Interpreter

2009-12-06 Thread Daniel Moerner
Hi David, I see that you've done the work to write an interpreter for the FOCAL language. Recently, a request for this package was filed in Debian GNU/Linux.[1] I'd be interested in packaging your interpreter for distribution in Debian (and by extension, Ubuntu) because it seems like a useful