On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:40:12PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian
vagr...@freegeek.org writes:
If I understand correctly, the problems are:
- etherboot ships with
Hi,
What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE?
Gergely
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:35:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:40:12PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:21:04PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
Hi,
What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE?
I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some
delay.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:35:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net
Hi,
I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some
delay.
So Vagrant: is it OK for you if we don't solve this for etherboot?
Gergely
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
Hi,
What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE?
kvm *is* qemu. Stable series (qemu-kvm) of kvm are based on stable
series of qemu.
But it does not really matter. It's more: I don't quite understand
what are you talking about change to gPXE (you
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:56:22PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some
delay.
So Vagrant: is it OK for you if we don't solve this for etherboot?
i think it would still make sense for etherboot to ship the appropriate roms
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@freegeek.org
writes:
If I understand correctly, the problems are:
- etherboot ships with rom.gz, which is not usable by qemu, (major)
- etherboot installed
7 matches
Mail list logo
