Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
Guido Günther wrote: Point of this br is: Would you mind to change the Description field in debian/control accordingly? Care to propose a patch? -- Guido I don't know what to write there. If I had known, I wouldn't have created this bug report. AFAICS kvm 88 is in kernel 2.6.31.5, so

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-02 Thread Harald Dunkel
Guido Günther wrote: KVM is the unstable tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm you're fine with what's in the kernel. Cheers, -- Guido AFAICS there is no qemu-kvm in Debian. And Qemu doesn't make use of the

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-11-02 Thread Guido Günther
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:45:29AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Guido Günther wrote: KVM is the unstable tree so yes, if you're running kvm you probably want the modules shipped with the package. If you're running qemu-kvm you're fine with what's in the kernel. Cheers, -- Guido

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-10-30 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: kvm-source Version: 88+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would be very nice to find some information about this in the Description field of the kvm-source package. Would you recommend to install and build kvm-source, if I am running Debian's

Bug#553327: kvm-source already in kernel, but nobody knows

2009-10-30 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:58:07AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Package: kvm-source Version: 88+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Since kvm is already in the kernel source tree, it would be very nice to find some information about this in the Description field of the kvm-source package. Would you