Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Andrew, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 09:37:02PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Out of date with upstream. * Buggy. (1 RC bug). * NPOASR. (Never part of a

Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
I will do a proper orphan of a bunch of packages soon, as I am completely our of time. But in the meanwhile take this mail as an orphan bug report in wnpp. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. And merry Xmas. El 24/12/2012 19:30, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org escribió: Hi Andrew, On

Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/24/2012 07:26 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: The package is no longer RC-buggy and /has/ been part of a stable release, though this is only because of the action of NMUers. I've added them to Cc: Mehdi, Bastian, do you have any personal

Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-16 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
Package: dogtail Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Out of date with upstream. *

Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?

2009-11-01 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: dogtail Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Out of date with upstream. * Buggy. (1