Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Package: audtty Version: 0.1.11-1 Severity: normal Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your

Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I thought people were supposed to discuss it on -devel@ before starting a MBF? Anyway, ways you could have made it better: - provide a step by step guide to reproduce the problem - use a usertag to follow all the bugs - provide a link to a wiki page where you would have put more info about

Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I thought people were supposed to discuss it on -devel@ before starting a MBF? What is a MBF? Anyway, ways you could have made it better: - provide a step by step guide to reproduce the problem - use a usertag to follow all the bugs - provide a link to a wiki page

Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/11/09 at 13:50 +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote: Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I thought people were supposed to discuss it on -devel@ before starting a MBF? What is a MBF? mass bug filing. Anyway, ways you could have made it better: - provide a step by step guide to reproduce the problem

Bug#553936: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: What is a MBF? mass bug filing. thanks I am not sure but do you think that it is a good way to link against a library without specify that you link against it? The question is not about what I think. The question is whether it's reasonable to expect A LOT of