Bug#553967: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-12-07 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Peter Fritzsche peter.fritzs...@gmx.de wrote: Package: ayttm Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: normal Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU

Bug#553967: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Package: ayttm Version: 0.6.1-1 Severity: normal Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building your

Bug#553967: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Peter Fritzsche peter.fritzs...@gmx.de wrote: Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the

Bug#553967: FTBFS with binutils-gold

2009-11-02 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Kartik Mistry wrote: Thanks for your hardwork for binutils-gold testing. Can you provide me more hints to fix the package. Probably, entry in wikipage like, http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS will be helpful while doing mass FTBFS bugs filing. Thanks for the info a draft entry can be