On 2009-11-20 20:00 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> It could also be that the first-pass resolver is selecting that
> package, and it doesn't get dropped later because it isn't unused.
Yes, that seems to be the reason.
> If so, "-o Aptitude::Auto-Install=false" would probably work around
> this,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:39:11PM +0100, Sven Joachim was
heard to say:
> On 2009-11-20 06:51 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > Okay, here's some more information that I think might be useful. I
> > marked packages for upgrade, and libsnmp-base and libsnmp15 are marked
> > for upgrade. libsnm
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:39:11PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> This sounds very much like #556042 to me, which is fixed in aptitude
> 0.6.1.3. Alas, that version FTBFS on 64-bit archs.
When it builds, I'm happy to test it.
> Do you have a package installed (dict, e.g.) that recommends gawk?
No
On 2009-11-20 06:51 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Okay, here's some more information that I think might be useful. I
> marked packages for upgrade, and libsnmp-base and libsnmp15 are marked
> for upgrade. libsnmp-base depends on gawk. However, libsnmp-base
> conflicts with libsmi2-common, an
Okay, here's some more information that I think might be useful. I
marked packages for upgrade, and libsnmp-base and libsnmp15 are marked
for upgrade. libsnmp-base depends on gawk. However, libsnmp-base
conflicts with libsmi2-common, and so the dependency resolver got
invoked. I chose, using th
5 matches
Mail list logo
