Bug#558013: Segfault when seting n-th bit of number, with large n

Hi Thomas, Just to be clear, I believe the original bug report demonstrated a bug in the way memory exhaustion was handled - i.e. segfaulting rather than exiting gracefully. I don't know whether this bug has been fixed. I only wanted to record the fact that because of Derek's and Paolo's improv

Bug#558013: Segfault when seting n-th bit of number, with large n

Hi, Following the discussion at: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-smalltalk/2009-01/msg00115.html Derek Zhou and Paolo Bonzini made some improvements to the garbage collection algorithm with these three commits to libgst/oop.c: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/smalltalk.git/commit/?id=8d8

Bug#558013: Segfault when seting n-th bit of number, with large n

On 11/25/2009 10:48 PM, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: Package: gnu-smalltalk Version: 3.0.3-2 Severity: normal Hello, GNU Smalltalk segfaults if I try to set the 100-th bit of a number (maybe it could print an error message and fail gracefully): st> 0 bitAt: 100 put: 1 The memory overf

Bug#558013: Segfault when seting n-th bit of number, with large n

Package: gnu-smalltalk Version: 3.0.3-2 Severity: normal Hello, GNU Smalltalk segfaults if I try to set the 100-th bit of a number (maybe it could print an error message and fail gracefully): st> 0 bitAt: 100 put: 1 "Global garbage collection... done, heap grown" "Global garbage collecti