Guido Günther wrote:
The guest should be powered off but still defined - that's the correct
behaviour. Undefining the vm is out of question since you'd lose the
configuration data then.
I don't see this. The data has been migrated to the new host.
What would we loose?
IMHO having 2 virtual
Sorry, but I a not sure that I got you correctly. I just
select the guest in the virt-manager gui, click on migrate,
and select the new host. I do not know whats happening
inside, but I have to assume that it is using libvirt.
Do you think this is a problem of virt-manager?
Regards
Harri
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 01:18:36PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Sorry, but I a not sure that I got you correctly. I just
select the guest in the virt-manager gui, click on migrate,
and select the new host. I do not know whats happening
inside, but I have to assume that it is using libvirt.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 04:48:59PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Package: libvirt0
Version: 0.7.2-3
After the migration the guest is defined on both old and
new host. Esp. when you are dealing with a large set of
hosts there is a high risk that you activate both guests
by accident,
4 matches
Mail list logo
