John Lindgren wrote:
Perhaps you could try packaging the audacious and audacious-plugins
2.3-beta3 (http://distfiles.atheme.org)? If there are fixes/changes
that need to be made then let me know and hopefully I can get them in
before the final 2.3 release.
Peace,
John Lindgren
On
John Lindgren wrote:
Perhaps you could try packaging the audacious and audacious-plugins
2.3-beta3 (http://distfiles.atheme.org)? If there are fixes/changes
that need to be made then let me know and hopefully I can get them in
before the final 2.3 release.
Peace,
John Lindgren
Sure, I'll
Perhaps you could try packaging the audacious and audacious-plugins
2.3-beta3 (http://distfiles.atheme.org)? If there are fixes/changes
that need to be made then let me know and hopefully I can get them in
before the final 2.3 release.
Peace,
John Lindgren
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 21:08 -0700,
William Pitcock, the last active maintainer I know of, has said he no
longer intends to maintain Audacious in Debian. If you could pick up
the slack that would be greatly appreciated. If there is any help I can
give from the upstream side I will be happy to give it.
Peace,
John Lindgren
Hi!
John Lindgren wrote:
William Pitcock, the last active maintainer I know of, has said he no
longer intends to maintain Audacious in Debian. If you could pick up
the slack that would be greatly appreciated. If there is any help I can
give from the upstream side I will be happy to give
Hi! As of March 27th 2.2 hasn't hit unstable.
Judging from popcon it would seem it's a reasonably popular package
(1899 installs out of 36801 installs of linux-sound-base work out to
approx. 5% of the relevant installs? If I'm reading this well).
Are you in need of mantainers?
Thanks in
6 matches
Mail list logo
