On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:19:27AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc."):
> > forcemerge 560070 586691
> > thanks
> ...
> > We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
>
> Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc."):
> forcemerge 560070 586691
> thanks
...
> We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #560070 be
fixed in a stable release update ?
> We're migrating to a situation
Hi!
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 11:19:27 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#586691: dpkg-buildpackage and LDFLAGS etc."):
> > forcemerge 560070 586691
> > thanks
> ...
> > We have dpkg-buildflags nowadays for this.
> Thanks. I have just read #560070. Can I request that #5600
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think that would be acceptable for a stable
> update, as some maintainers started relying on dpkg-buildpackage's
> behaviour of setting those flags and stopped setting them in their
> rules files. So there's a chance of regressions.
4 matches
Mail list logo