On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> + * Add procps build-dep to allow the testsuite to call "ps" in
> +test/zsh/ok4zshdb.sh:get_processor().
Er, scratch my last comment.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I think that's fair; let's make the Debian packaging only run make
> check if /dev/tty exists. @Clint: would the attached patch be ok with
> you? I fixed some other small things with respect to double builds and
> the like.
Looks
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> Therefore what I suggest is do some sort of test to see if there's an
> interactive tty and if not skip all of the tests. Or unconditionally skip
> all tests when building on Debian for packaging.
I think that's fair; let's make the Debian packaging
First and foremost, thanks everyone for such diligent and detailed work;
also thanks for the interest in zshdb and contacting me about this.
In theory, I suppose it is possible to make this work, but in practice I
don't see much of a point of it here.
Some debuggers do support the notion of remot
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Relevant part:
>
> Actually that's not the whole relevant part; there's also:
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> get_processor:3: command not found: ps
> ./ok4zshdb.sh:43: com
Hi
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part:
Actually that's not the whole relevant part; there's also:
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
get_processor:3: command not found: ps
./ok4zshdb.sh:43: command not found: -if
checking Checking whether /bin/zsh is compa
> Any idea why?
Unfortunately, no. We're tracking this at
https://launchpad.net/bugs/514359 (not much info there at the moment).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:56:11AM +0300, Ilya Barygin wrote:
> We have this problem in Ubuntu (where arch:all packages are built on
> buildds), and some testing shows that the failure can be reproduced in
> sbuild, but not in pbuilder.
Any idea why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis
We have this problem in Ubuntu (where arch:all packages are built on
buildds), and some testing shows that the failure can be reproduced in
sbuild, but not in pbuilder.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:33:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > /build/user-zshdb_0.03+git20090920-1-amd64-hSCnaM/zshdb-0.03+git20090920/lib/processor.sh:37:
> > no such file or directory:
What? Where did it go?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Source: zshdb
Version: 0.03+git20090920-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091210 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/bu
11 matches
Mail list logo
