Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cobertura".
* Package name: cobertura
Version : 1.9.3+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Mark Doliner
* URL : http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/
* License : mostly GPL-2+ and Apache 1.1
Section : java
It b
I have one question about this package. Is there any particular reason
why you created the package from scratch instead of basing it on the
cobertura package from Ubuntu?
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I have one question about this package. Is there any particular reason
> why you created the package from scratch instead of basing it on the
> cobertura package from Ubuntu?
*Sigh*, it is really my bad for not checking if that package was al
On Tue Jan 26 22:06, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cobertura
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Matthew, thanks for reviewing this package.
Please see below my answers.
> - any reason you're not using dh --with ant or --with javahelper and are
> doing
> everything by hand?
Now I'm using javahelper. It simplified some ta
Le Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:15:54PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
>
> Upstream clarify this in her website
> (http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/license.html ):
>
> Because ant
> tasks are loaded directly into the runtime of ant, and the GPL is incompatable
> with all versions of the Apache Softw
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:15:54PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
>> Upstream clarify this in her website
>> (http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/license.html ):
>> Because ant tasks are loaded directly into the runtime of ant, and the
>> GPL is incompatable with all vers
On Mon Feb 01 21:15, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> > - is there any reason why you are depending on openjdk rather than
> > default-jdk? If not, you should depend on default-jdk. You should also
> > probably include the other virtual packages (java6-runtime etc)
> >
> > - ditto, you should build-dep
On Tue Feb 02 11:35, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear Miguel,
>
> this information is outdated as the GPL version 3 is compatible with the
> Apache
> License version 2.0, see:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Yes, but the files in question are licenced under Apache 1.1, so th
9 matches
Mail list logo
