Cc'ing to Hatta-san, the maintainer of ptex-bin.
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 13:22:43 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Not, I don't think so. But I guess all people using ptex from testing
> will have a broken ptex installation after they upgraded their TL. I
> assume both packages have to migrate to testing
On 09.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi,
> I am a bit out of my mind ATM, but does that block the texlive
> transistion at the same moment? If yes, that would be a real pain.
>
Not, I don't think so. But I guess all people using ptex from testing
will have a broken ptex instal
On Sa, 09 Jan 2010, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> As you uploaded as "urgency=low" we'll have to wait 10 days until
> this NMU enters testing. Was this intended?
Actually I never care for the urgency ... I once read that it should
be used to make sure that an RC bug does not enter from unstable into
test
On 09.01.10 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
Hi Norbert,
> as discussed in the bug report YOSHINO Yoshihito has provided a patch
> that links ptex against libkpathsea5.
>
> According to LowThresholdNmu I have uploaded this package
> (versioned as 3.1.10+0.04b-2.2) directly without any
tags 561427 + patch
thanks
Hi everyone,
as discussed in the bug report YOSHINO Yoshihito has provided a patch
that links ptex against libkpathsea5.
According to LowThresholdNmu I have uploaded this package
(versioned as 3.1.10+0.04b-2.2) directly without any DELAYED upload.
Thanks a lot and all
5 matches
Mail list logo
