On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> I was just running "sh -x /usr/sbin/blend-update-usermenus science" like the
> apt hook and was guessing from that ... I didn't have closer look into the
> script itself. Looking right now into it, it seems it is just reading the
> fi
Hi Andreas,
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
> But yould you please be more verbose why you
> think that
>
> blend-update-usermenus
>
> is regenerating /etc/blends/science/science.conf ? This is not
> the case but perhaps I might overlook something
I was just running "sh -x /
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:54:01PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
>
> is there any special reason for providing /etc/blends/science/science.conf
> with the package and regenerating it via blend-update-usermenus through
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90science-config too?
Thanks for the comment. I was about t
Hi there,
On Friday 25 December 2009, you wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
> upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
> prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But
> this is not the real
Hi there,
On Friday 25 December 2009, Holger wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
> upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
> prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But
> this is not the re
5 matches
Mail list logo