Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2011-02-14 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le dimanche 13 février 2011 à 22:45 +0200, Stefano Rivera a écrit : Hi Olivier (2010.12.23_10:21:35_+0200) I think it would be good to have it packaged ASAP, and possibly included in squeeze... although the freeze rules may not allow it. I've taken over maintenance of this package

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2011-02-13 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Olivier (2010.12.23_10:21:35_+0200) I think it would be good to have it packaged ASAP, and possibly included in squeeze... although the freeze rules may not allow it. I've taken over maintenance of this package now. I think it's too late to do something this drastic for squeeze, via

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-23 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 19:51 -0500, Decklin Foster a écrit : Excerpts from Clint Adams's message of Wed Dec 22 14:53:23 -0500 2010: Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? Looks like it. I'll run some tests and see if there's any problematic changes in 3.0.8 (code diff from

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-22 Thread Clint Adams
Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-22 Thread Decklin Foster
Excerpts from Clint Adams's message of Wed Dec 22 14:53:23 -0500 2010: Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? Looks like it. I'll run some tests and see if there's any problematic changes in 3.0.8 (code diff from 3.0.8.1 to 3.2.0 is minimal.) -- things change. deck...@red-bean.com -- To