Bug#565801: [pkg-firebird-general] Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds fine with -O0

2010-03-29 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Damyan Ivanov, Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:09:04PM +0300 |=- > Since the parser module is used everywhere, I'll try to disable the > optimization only on freebsd-amd64 for the next upload. This is already the case, sorry for the noise. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds fine with -O0

2010-03-29 Thread Damyan Ivanov
tags 565801 pending thanks -=| Modestas Vainius, Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:26:31AM +0200 |=- > Thanks to very helpful hints from Petr, I was able to track down > what atomic g++ flag and which object file is the problem. It > appears that current (4.4.3-2) g++ miscompiles src/dsql/parse.cpp > whe

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds fine with -O0

2010-03-26 Thread Modestas Vainius
tags 565801 patch thanks Hello, On sekmadienis 21 Kovas 2010 13:34:43 Petr Salinger wrote: > > I found that changing -O level is sufficient to build this package. > > The next step should be find somehow, which ".o" file built with -O1 > > causes the trouble. > > dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc > w

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds fine with -O0

2010-03-21 Thread Petr Salinger
Hi again. > I found that changing -O level is sufficient to build this package. > The next step should be find somehow, which ".o" file built with -O1 > causes the trouble. dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc wait for segfault (or hang) during ../gen/firebird/bin/gbak_static -MODE read_on

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds fine with -O0

2010-03-21 Thread Petr Salinger
retitle 565801 firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64 with -O1, builds with -O0 -- Hi, I found that changing -O level is sufficient to build this package. The next step should be find somehow, which ".o" file built with -O1 causes the trouble. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

2010-01-19 Thread Petr Salinger
Hello. Firebird IPC is black magic. I am not sure if process-shared semaphores are really needed. "superserver" seems to not need them at all (at least on theory). And still it fails to build. The place it fails is interesting, though. The checkMutex function (src/jrd/trace/TraceConfigStorage.c

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

2010-01-19 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Hi Petr, -=| Petr Salinger, Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:55:27PM +0100 |=- > The current GNU/kFreeBSD does not support process-shared pthread > mutexes. It also does not support process-shared semaphores. > > Is the inter-process sharing really necessary ? > The calls inside are in a form of sem_init(

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*

2010-01-19 Thread Petr Salinger
severity 565801 important -- Hi. The current GNU/kFreeBSD does not support process-shared pthread mutexes. It also does not support process-shared semaphores. Is the inter-process sharing really necessary ? The calls inside are in a form of sem_init(sem, 0, 0), i.e. only thread-shared. Petr

Bug#565801: firebird2.5: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: ConfigStorage: mutex init error, status = 78

2010-01-18 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Cyril Brulebois, Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:45:33PM +0100 |=- > Package: src:firebird2.5 > Version: 2.5.0.25784~ReleaseCandidate1.ds2-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > Hi, > > your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-* in experimental