Bug#565918: apt-get update and gpg database status

2010-01-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 20 Jan 2010 12:15:03 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I rely on the --print-uris option in apt-offline. If the user uses the > > --print-uris option with the update command, they get a fake impression > > that the APT database is not GPG clean. > > > > Can/Should this be changed to not t

Bug#565918: apt-get update and gpg database status

2010-01-19 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Doing an strace shows many of these: --- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) --- unlink("/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_Release.gpg") = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_Release.gpg", 0xbfab09b4) = -1

Bug#565918: apt-get update and gpg database status

2010-01-19 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: apt Version: 0.7.25 Severity: normal Dear APT Devs, Following is a problem that I see from a apt-offline user perspective. Step 1 == 14:03:10 r...@champaran:~ $ sudo aptitude update 1>/dev/null We want to update the apt database here. This is taken care in apt-offline too. Ste