On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:55:43PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 19-Feb-2010, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:18:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > One possible reason is that there appears to be no specification
> > > on the parsing of Markdown format, other than ???what John
>
On 19-Feb-2010, Axel Beckert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:18:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > One possible reason is that there appears to be no specification
> > on the parsing of Markdown format, other than ???what John
> > Gruber's /usr/bin/markdown does???.
>
> Sure there is:
>
> http
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:18:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > > Reading their copyright files, it seems like libtext-markdown-perl
> > > is a fork of John Gruber's markdown, which seems like not much
> > > maintained upstream (last release in 2004).
> >
> > Is there a reason why markdown should
On 08-Feb-2010, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > Reading their copyright files, it seems like libtext-markdown-perl
> > is a fork of John Gruber's markdown, which seems like not much
> > maintained upstream (last release in 2004).
>
> Is there a reason why markdown should be kept in
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Bernd Zeimetz, Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 01:09:04PM +0100 |=-
>> as we have three packages now which provide /usr/bin/markdown it
>> could make
>> sense to use alternatives here, although I didn't check if the three
>> implementations are compatible enough. At least this woul
5 matches
Mail list logo
