Bug#568897: [debhelper-devel] Bug#568897: Bug#568897: debhelper: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck should prevent override_dh_auto_test rule to be run

2018-12-23 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Hello all! Just pinging this again for reconsideration. I ran into this recently, and copy/pasting bits of makefile throughout various packages' debian/rules seems like the wrong solution to me. -- Harlan Lieberman-Berg ~hlieberman

Bug#568897: [debhelper-devel] Bug#568897: Bug#568897: debhelper: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck should prevent override_dh_auto_test rule to be run

2017-11-29 Thread Christoph Berg
Hi, about the "nocheck" part of the discussion, could the "wontfix" ruling be reconsidered nowadays? "dh" is now the standard packaging style, and "override_dh_auto_test" is the standard way to signal "hey this package has a testsuite" in debian/rules, so it just be logical to have our standard

Bug#568897: [debhelper-devel] Bug#568897: Bug#568897: debhelper: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck should prevent override_dh_auto_test rule to be run

2016-12-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Peter, You raise a lot of interesting questions about the general handling of DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS in the various tools. I haven't got any real answer for the general question -- and, truthfully, your questions lead me to think it needs to be considered on a case-by-case basis -- so I'd like to

Bug#568897: [debhelper-devel] Bug#568897: Bug#568897: debhelper: DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck should prevent override_dh_auto_test rule to be run

2016-12-13 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:23:40PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Monday, December 12, 2016 10:57:20 AM CST Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 08:22:09PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > > Alternatively: if the logic was all in dh (to skip both dh_auto_test > > > and