Hi!
* Alexander Sack [100412 13:29]:
[..]
> Not a big deal ... especially since builders dont pick up alternative build
> depends anyway --- so syncs wont be possible anyway.
What is the status of this bug? Yesterday enigmail was removed from
testing and icedove propagated to testing, so it's n
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:26:00PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Am 2010-04-11 20:26, schrieb Leo 'costela' Antunes:
> > On 11/04/10 20:13, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> >
> >> So the attached patch should do the trick again.
> >>
> > I assumed the package Alexander had prepared already
Am 2010-04-11 20:26, schrieb Leo 'costela' Antunes:
> On 11/04/10 20:13, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
>
>> So the attached patch should do the trick again.
>>
> I assumed the package Alexander had prepared already
> included your first patch, so I didn't even check.
>
So that the patch will
On 11/04/10 20:13, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Same error I got by my first attempts to build the packages.
> This was fixed with my first patch, but it seems that this change was
> not considered.
>
> So the attached patch should do the trick again.
Oh, that was silly. I assumed the package Alexa
Am 2010-04-11 20:01, schrieb Leo 'costela' Antunes:
> On 11/04/10 16:52, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> Can you verify that the package below just builds now?
>>
>>
>> https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/ppa/+files/enigmail_1.0.1-0ubuntu1~asac2.dsc
>>
>
> I'm getting:
>
> /tmp/buildd/enigmail-1.0
On 11/04/10 16:52, Alexander Sack wrote:
Can you verify that the package below just builds now?
https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/ppa/+files/enigmail_1.0.1-0ubuntu1~asac2.dsc
I'm getting:
/tmp/buildd/enigmail-1.0.1/allmakefiles.sh: line 113:
/tmp/buildd/enigmail-1.0.1/toolkit/tool
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
> Alexander Sack wrote:
> >> I see, I didn't check the ubuntu pkg. So added a patch to corresponding
> >> bug in icedove-dev already [1]
> >>
> >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577021
> >
> > ... let me k
Alexander Sack wrote:
>> I see, I didn't check the ubuntu pkg. So added a patch to corresponding
>> bug in icedove-dev already [1]
>>
>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577021
>
> ... let me know when icedove has either of the patches so i can upload the
> package.
Michael b
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 02:10:32PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:42:14 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:37:16PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> > >
> > > Needed to add mimecryp.h, mimemoz2.h and nsStreamConverter.h by hand,
> > > I think they
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:42:14 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:37:16PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> >
> > Needed to add mimecryp.h, mimemoz2.h and nsStreamConverter.h by hand,
> > I think they should find a way into the icedove-dev package.
>
> yes, that needs to go in
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:37:16PM +0200, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Am 2010-04-08 20:59, schrieb Alexander Sack:
> > The package is done and floating in a ppa ... it needs some build-depends
> > love and for debian we need to add --with-system-nspr and --with-system-nss
> > to configure flags.
>
Am 2010-04-08 20:59, schrieb Alexander Sack:
> The package is done and floating in a ppa ... it needs some build-depends
> love and for debian we need to add --with-system-nspr and --with-system-nss
> to configure flags.
>
build-depends love turned out as following:
libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev
12 matches
Mail list logo
