Hello Ansgar,
Am 17.02.2010 um 07:46 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
That's why I suggest to make this behaviour an option for the
submission. Perhaps it would be better to have that as atd-option?
Then I guess an option at time of submission is the way to go.
Very good.
Another thingie on my
Patrik Schindler writes:
>> I plan to get at sending the command in case there are errors soon.
>> Do you think there are other cases in which the actual command would
>> be
>> useful?
>
> From my point of view, this is often the case. For example when the
> job will run some time in the future a
Hi Ansgar,
Sorry, I didn't check 244533 before submitting since from the subject
it wasn't clear to me what the submitter meant.
Thanks for taking care for at!
Am 17.02.2010 um 03:49 schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
I plan to get at sending the command in case there are errors soon.
Do you think
merge 244533 570120
thanks
Hi,
Patrik Schindler writes:
> It would be helpful in some cases to have the actual command given to
> batch/at in the usual job completion mail as well as the output
> generated from the command itself. Perhaps user chooseable with
> ~/.atrc and/or cmdline-switch?
(
Package: at
Version: 3.1.10.2
Severity: wishlist
It would be helpful in some cases to have the actual command given to batch/at
in the usual job completion mail as well as the output generated from the
command itself. Perhaps user chooseable with ~/.atrc and/or cmdline-switch?
(Inspired from the
5 matches
Mail list logo
