On 09/26/2010 05:38 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
>> With the upstream dm rules yo do not need special udev rules.
>
> Please provide a patch. The rules are RedHat specific (see the
> definition of DM_SBIN_PATH, which even is a workaround fo
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:22:32AM +0200, Milan Broz wrote:
> With the upstream dm rules yo do not need special udev rules.
Please provide a patch. The rules are RedHat specific (see the
definition of DM_SBIN_PATH, which even is a workaround for dracut).
Bastian
--
Without freedom of choice the
reassign 573073 lvm2
block 573073 593625
thanks
Hey,
On 26/09/2010 Milan Broz wrote:
> On 09/25/2010 11:19 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 25, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >
> >> the buglog of bug#573073 (filed against cryptsetup) indicates that the
> >> lvm2 initscript at boot process finishes bef
On 09/25/2010 11:19 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 25, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>
>> the buglog of bug#573073 (filed against cryptsetup) indicates that the
>> lvm2 initscript at boot process finishes before the devices are actually
>> created by udev.
> There is nothing wrong with this.
>
>> i gues
On Sep 25, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> the buglog of bug#573073 (filed against cryptsetup) indicates that the
> lvm2 initscript at boot process finishes before the devices are actually
> created by udev.
There is nothing wrong with this.
> i guess this is a general problem concerning several initscrip
Hey LVM and Udev package maintainers,
the buglog of bug#573073 (filed against cryptsetup) indicates that the
lvm2 initscript at boot process finishes before the devices are actually
created by udev. this leads to a race condition in some situations,
where the cryptsetup init script tries to access
6 matches
Mail list logo
